Hendley v. Daw Drug Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hendley v. Daw Drug Co.

267 A.D. 943, 47 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5620

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 23, 1944·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the authority of Kelly v. Bose (291 N. Y. 611) and Connolly v. Bursch (149 App. Div. 772). All concur, except Dowling, J., who concurs as to the reversal, but votes for granting a new trial on the ground that the defendant changed the conditions and created a new hazard by leaving the hump of ice complained of. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff by reason of his falling on an [944]*944icy sidewalk. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present— Cunningham, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the authority of Kelly v. Bose (291 N. Y. 611) and Connolly v. Bursch (149 App. Div. 772). All concur, except Dowling, J., who concurs as to the reversal, but votes for granting a new trial on the ground that the defendant changed the conditions and created a new hazard by leaving the hump of ice complained of. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff by reason of his falling on an [944]*944icy sidewalk. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present— Cunningham, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Hendley v. Daw Drug Co., 267 A.D. 943, 47 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5620 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

267 A.D. 943 (Hendley v. Daw Drug Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related