Hendler v. Meadows
183 A. 214, 116 N.J.L. 176, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 217
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hendler v. Meadows, 183 A. 214, 116 N.J.L. 176, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 217 (N.J. 1936).
183 A. 214 (Hendler v. Meadows) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Tuccillo
185 A.2d 222 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Cermak v. Hertz Corp.
147 A.2d 800 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
Decker v. Everson
187 A. 783 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1936)