Hendler v. Meadows
183 A. 214, 116 N.J.L. 176, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 217
This text of 183 A. 214 (Hendler v. Meadows) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hendler v. Meadows, 183 A. 214, 116 N.J.L. 176, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 217 (N.J. 1936).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Tuccillo
185 A.2d 222 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Cermak v. Hertz Corp.
147 A.2d 800 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
Decker v. Everson
187 A. 783 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1936)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
183 A. 214, 116 N.J.L. 176, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendler-v-meadows-nj-1936.