Hendler & Murray, P. C. v. Lambert

New York Court of Appeals

Hendler & Murray, P. C. v. Lambert

492 N.E.2d 773, 67 N.Y.2d 831, 501 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 17584

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 25, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 492 N.E.2d 773 (Hendler & Murray, P. C. v. Lambert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hendler & Murray, P. C. v. Lambert, 492 N.E.2d 773, 67 N.Y.2d 831, 501 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 17584 (N.Y. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order modified, with costs to appellant, by deleting so much thereof as provided that Hendler & Murray, P. C., exists as the alter ego of its predecessor partnership and is liable for the debts and obligations thereof, and substituting a provision that Hendler & Murray, P. C., is a proper party to the arbitration proceeding in view of its adoption of the rights and obligations owing to respondent Arthur Lambert pursuant to the 1976 partnership agreement of the Hendler & Murray partnership and any written modification thereof and, as so modified, order affirmed. The extent to which Hendler & Murray, P. C., is liable to Lambert for debts and obligations of the predecessor partnership is a question to be settled by arbitration.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order modified, with costs to appellant, by deleting so much thereof as provided that Hendler & Murray, P. C., exists as the alter ego of its predecessor partnership and is liable for the debts and obligations thereof, and substituting a provision that Hendler & Murray, P. C., is a proper party to the arbitration proceeding in view of its adoption of the rights and obligations owing to respondent Arthur Lambert pursuant to the 1976 partnership agreement of the Hendler & Murray partnership and any written modification thereof and, as so modified, order affirmed. The extent to which Hendler & Murray, P. C., is liable to Lambert for debts and obligations of the predecessor partnership is a question to be settled by arbitration.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

492 N.E.2d 773, 67 N.Y.2d 831, 501 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 17584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendler-murray-p-c-v-lambert-ny-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack