Hendin v. American Distilling Co.

54 F. Supp. 863, 1944 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2509
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois
DecidedApril 8, 1944
DocketCivil Action No. P-321
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 F. Supp. 863 (Hendin v. American Distilling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hendin v. American Distilling Co., 54 F. Supp. 863, 1944 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2509 (S.D. Ill. 1944).

Opinion

ADAIR, District Judge.

Findings of Fact.

1. The amount involved and in dispute in this cause is in excess of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000).

2. The plaintiff, Harry Hendin, is a resident and citizen of the State of Missouri. The defendant, The American Distilling Company, is a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Maryland, is licensed to do business in the State of Illinois, operates its largest plant in this Federal Court District, and the warehouse receipts which evidence the ownership of the trust r«s [864]*864are located within this Federal Court District. The defendants, G. W. Michell and Gilbert B. Geiger, are residents and citizens of the State of Illinois and of this Federal Court District. All of the other defendants are residents and citizens of states other than the State of Illinois or the State of Missouri.

3. On December 11, 1943, pursuant to resolutions of the Board of Directors of the American Distilling Company, adopted on November 12, and December 9, 1943, respectively, said company caused to be made and executed a certain Trust Indenture wherein and whereby it appointed and designated Gilbert B. Geiger, of Peoria Heights, County of Peoria, and State of Illinois, as Trustee for the stockholders of the American Distilling Company, and caused to be transferred, set over, assigned and delivered unto said Trustee all of the right, title, and interest of The American Distilling Company in and to warehouse receipts evidencing ownership of 237,500 barrels of whiskey, located at and more particularly described as follows:

Location of whiskey No. of barrels by ages No. of 4 Years 3 Years 2 Years Receipts or More or More or More 1 Year or More
American Distilling Co., Pekin, 111. 1 22,367 49,665 63,031 40,678
American Distilling Co., Sausalito, Calif. 1 2,259 7,696 8,023 7,611
New England Distilleries Clinton, Mass. 10 200
Hiram Walker, Peoria, 111. 3 300
Readville Distilleries, Boston, Mass. 6 166
James B. Beam, Clermont, Ky. 223 525 426
Pekin Warehouse Co., Pekin, 111. 94 1,003 4,295 5,760 450
Country Distilleries, Deatsville, Ky. 104 599 383 1,803 1,081
Commercial Dist. Corp., Terre Haute, Ind. 231 3,772 7,436 7,957 14
Totals 673 30,000 70,000 87,500 50,00u

4. At the time of the execution of the said Trust Indenture by The American Distilling Company, Gilbert B. Geiger joined in the execution of said Trust Indenture, thereby accepting the appointment as such Trustee, and has since said date been and still is acting as Trustee thereunder.

5. The Trust Indenture of December 11, 1943, and more specifically Articles III and IV thereof, grants to the stockholders of the Company the privilege of acquiring blended whiskey from the Trustee on the terms and conditions therein stated.

6. The said Trust Indenture of December 11, 1943, by Article V thereof, grants to the stockholders of the Company an additional privilege of acquiring from the Trustee bonded whiskey upon the terms and conditions therein stated.

7. The said Trust Indenture of December 11, 1943, by Article VIII thereof, makes provision for the sale by the Trustee of the whiskey not acquired by the stockholders of the company under the above stated privileges, and the payment of the proceeds of such sale to those stockholders who have elected not to exercise their said privileges.

8. Following the execution of said indenture dated December 11, 1943, the Company, acting pursuant to provisions of Article II thereof, caused to be mailed to each of its stockholders of record at the close of business on December 23, 1943, at their addresses as they appeared on the books of the Bank of Manhattan Company, one of the transfer agents of the defendant Company, a circular dated December 17, 1943, which said circular described in general the privileges granted by the fore[865]*865going provisions of the said Trust Indenture and the terms and conditions under which said privileges might be exercised by the stockholders. The Company, pursuant to Section 2 of said Article II, likewise caused to be mailed to said stockholders of record of December 23, 1943, at their said addresses, a form of order prepared by the Trustee for use by the stockholders in the exercise of the foregoing privileges pertaining to blended whiskey.

9. As a result of the mailing of the said circular of December 17, 1943, and said orders, the Trustee received numerous orders from those stockholders electing to exercise the privilege of acquiring blended whiskey, which said orders under the evidence aggregated, to wit: in excess of Nine Million Dollars ($9,000,000) and were in respect of in excess of 104,000 shares of stock of the company, out of a total of 250,000 shares outstanding, and are at the present date, according to the brief of the Trustee, in respect of in excess of 160,000 shares.

10. Due to regulations of and necessarily extended conferences with representatives of the Office of Price Administration, the fact that this cause was pending in this court undetermined, and other justifiable causes, it was impossible for the Trustee to comply within the time specified in the Trust Indenture of December 11, 1943, with the terms and provisions thereof relating to the delivery of whiskey to the beneficiaries of said trust. The Trustee, accordingly, on February 23, 1944, with the consent of the Company, executed an Amendatory Indenture extending until April 20, 1944, the period within which stockholders could exercise their privilege of acquiring bonded and blended whiskey, and changing from February 29, 1944, to April 20, 1944, the record date for identification of stockholders entitled to receive cash by reason of their election not to acquire blended whiskey, with appropriate provision by which such stockholders of record February 29, 1944, might reserve to themselves the privilege of receiving cash and thereafter sell their stock divested of such privilege. The Amendatory Indenture of February 23, 1944, likewise changed the brand names under which the respective whiskies are to be bottled; this change in brand names being the result of a request made to the Trustee by the Office of Price Administration. The change in the brand names does not and will not affect the proof, quantity, or quality of the whiskey.

11. The Trustee, following his acceptance of his appointment as such, by the Trust Indenture dated December 11, 1943, promptly entered upon the performance of his duties in that capacity and has diligently and efficiently performed all of his duties as such Trustee from the time of his appointment to date. He established an Office in the City of Peoria, Illinois, with a substantial number of employees. He employed counsel to advise him with respect to the correct performance of his duties. He has during the period intervening since his appointment devoted practically all of his time to the performance of his duties as Trustee. He has in all of the foregoing activities acted entirely according to his own business judgment. He has neither solicited nor accepted instructions, guidance or advice from the company. None of the persons whom he has employed, nor of the attorneys whom he has retained, has any business, professional or other connection with the company.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lutz v. Village 2 at New Hope, Inc.
71 Pa. D. & C.2d 595 (Bucks County Court of Common Pleas, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 F. Supp. 863, 1944 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendin-v-american-distilling-co-ilsd-1944.