Henderson v. United States Attorney General

376 F. App'x 292
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 4, 2010·No. No. 10-6206·Published

Opinion

[293]*293Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lamont Henderson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Henderson’s civil complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Henderson v. U.S. Attorney Gen., No. 3:09-cv02962-CMC, 2010 WL 146262 (D.S.C. filed Jan. 7, 2010; entered Jan. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. United States Attorney General, 376 F. App'x 292 (4th Cir. 2010).

376 F. App'x 292 (Henderson v. United States Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)