Henderson v. Town of Hope Mills

594 F. App'x 195
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 3, 2015·No. No. 14-2044·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[196] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Glenn Henderson, a pro se civil litigant, appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his civil action for the reasons explained in the court’s prior orders granting Defendants’ respective motions to dismiss. We have limited our appellate review to the issues raised in Henderson’s informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), and have found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Henderson v. Town of Hope Mills, No. 5:13-cv-00635-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 5, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. Town of Hope Mills, 594 F. App'x 195 (4th Cir. 2015).

594 F. App'x 195 (Henderson v. Town of Hope Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sillah v. Burwell
244 F. Supp. 3d 499 (D. Maryland, 2017)