Henderson v. Tobey

105 Ill. App. 154
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedNovember 1, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 105 Ill. App. 154 (Henderson v. Tobey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henderson v. Tobey, 105 Ill. App. 154 (Ill. Ct. App. 1903).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Burroughs

delivered the opinion of the court..

On November 14, 1900, the appellant conveyed to the appellee, by statutory form of warranty deed, certain lands in Vermilion county, Illinois, for the express consideration of $28,800. At the time the deed was made, the taxes on the lands for the year 1900 had not been paid, nor had they been, at the time the deed was made, extended by the county clerk against the lands, but under our statute such taxes were at that time, a lien upon the lands.

In June, 1901, the lands thus conveyed were sold for the taxes of 1900, as such taxes had not been paid, and the appellee afterward, but before this suit was commenced, redeemed the lands from such sale, it costing him $124.80 to do so. And by this action in covenant instituted in the Circuit Court of Vermilion County by the appellee against the appellant, the former thereby sought to recover the cost of such redemption from the latter under the covenants of warranty in the deed.

The appellant pleaded especially, by three pleas, that as a part of the consideration of the deed, the appellee, knowing the taxes on the lands for 1900 were unpaid, agreed by parol with the appellant, that he (appellee) would pay the taxes in question; and each plea confessed nominal damages of $1.

To these pleas the Circuit Court sustained a general demurrer. The appellant abided by his pleas, and the court gave judgment in favor of the appellee for the full amount of $124.30, to reverse which the appellant prosecutes this appeal, and urges that the pleas presented a good defense to the action for all but $1 damages, which they confessed; and that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer thereto and in awarding damages for more than $1.

And in that view we concur for the reasons given by us in the opinion in Lloyd v. Sandusky, 95 Ill. App. 593.

The judgment of the Circuit Court will therefore be reversed and the case remanded to that court with directions to overrule the demurrer to the pleas, and then proceed in the case as to law and justice appertain.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnett v. Hubbard
245 Ill. App. 109 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 Ill. App. 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-tobey-illappct-1903.