Henderson v. Synenberg

22 N.E.3d 1092, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1426
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 31, 2014
Docket2014-1898
StatusPublished

This text of 22 N.E.3d 1092 (Henderson v. Synenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henderson v. Synenberg, 22 N.E.3d 1092, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1426 (Ohio 2014).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 100910. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to strike appellant’s memorandum in support of jurisdiction, it is ordered by the court that the motion is denied. The appellee may file a memorandum in response to jurisdiction within 30 days from the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 N.E.3d 1092, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-synenberg-ohio-2014.