Henderson v. Stone

40 How. Pr. 333, 2 Sweeny 468
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided May 15, 1870·Published

Opinion

By the court, Freedman, J.

The proceedings, in the course of which the order appealed from was made, seem to have been instituted for the sole purpose of compelling the defendant, Stone, to pay the costs, amounting to twenty-eight dollars and ninety-five cents, alleged to be still, due upon a judgment of one thousand and twenty-eight dollars and ninety-five cents, the principal amount of which had been paid prior to the commencement of the proceedings. There is no proof that the court or a judge thereof ever acquired jurisdiction over the person of the appellant. The orignal order requiring the appellant to appear, to make discovery on oath concerning his property, was not served upon him during the time the order had any vitality, [334] but three days after the return day specified therein, and so far as there has been any appearance on the part of the appellant afterwards," it has been solely for the purpose of making his objections, by which no jurisdiction was conferred. The objection that there is a total want of jurisdiction may be taken at any stage in the case. The order appealed from, must be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. Stone, 40 How. Pr. 333, 2 Sweeny 468 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1870).

40 How. Pr. 333 (Henderson v. Stone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.