Henderson v. State

51 S.W.2d 686, 121 Tex. Crim. 47, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 390
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 Tex. Crim. 361
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 1, 1932·No. No. 15233.·Published

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for burglary; púñishmerit; three years in the penitentiary.

It is to be regretted that we cannot consider either the statement of facts or bills of exception because filed too late. The learned trial judge, in order to complete the trial of this case, extended his term of court one *48 week, which extended term ended October 10, 1931. This trial was concluded on October 7th, on which day the motion for new trial was overruled and notice of appeal given. Computation of time makes plain the fact that the ninety days after the giving of notice of appeal had expired, this being the time fixed by article 760, C. C. P., within which statement of facts and bills of exception must be prepared and filed. The bills of exception appearing in this record, and also the statement of facts, were filed on January 7, 1932. All were filed after the expiration of said ninety-day period, and for that reason cannot be considered. All matters of procedure appear to be regular.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. State, 51 S.W.2d 686, 121 Tex. Crim. 47, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 390 (Tex. 1932).

51 S.W.2d 686 (Henderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newman v. State
23 S.W.2d 367 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)