Henderson v. State
This text of 196 S.W. 1199 (Henderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant’s conviction was for murder, punishment being assessed at confinement for ten years in the penitentiary.
Motion for new trial contains quite a number of grounds complain *540 ing of alleged errors of the court with reference to charges and refusal to give requested instructions; and also a refusal of the court to grant a continuance. Also complaining that the evidence is not sufficient to support the conviction.
Hone of these matters can he reviewed in the absence of a statement of facts and bill of exceptions. The exceptions to the charge as given by the court can not be revised or intelligently discussed even without a statement of facts. The court’s charge may have been sufficient under the evidence viewed in the light of the allegations and indictment.
Under the condition of the record this judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 S.W. 1199, 81 Tex. Crim. 539, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-state-texcrimapp-1917.