Henderson v. State

98 S.W. 1055, 50 Tex. Crim. 413, 1906 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 315
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 49 Tex. Crim. 269
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 14, 1906·No. No. 3416.·Published

Opinions

HENDERSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law, his punishment fixed at a fine of $25 and twenty days confinement in the county jail. There are no bills of exception in this record, nor special charges requested by appellant. The same question is involved in this case as in Tombeaugh v. State, just decided, and in accordance with that decision we hold that the defense set up by appellant of an .accommodation loan, is no defense to the alleged sale, and that the court was not required” to charge on that subject. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. State, 98 S.W. 1055, 50 Tex. Crim. 413, 1906 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 315 (Tex. 1906).

98 S.W. 1055 (Henderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alexandrine Mager v. Felix Grima
49 U.S. 490 (Supreme Court, 1850)
Ray v. State
79 S.W. 535 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1904)
Vanarsdale v. State
34 S.W. 931 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1896)
Keaton v. State
38 S.W. 522 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1896)
Skinner v. State
25 S.E. 364 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)
Commonwealth v. Abrams
23 N.E. 53 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1890)
Taylor v. State
121 Ala. 39 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)