Henderson v. State
This text of 5 Blackf. 29 (Henderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SCIRE FACIAS against bail on a recognizance conditioned for the principal’s appearance, at the next term of the Circuit Court, to answer the state on a charge of forgery, abide the order of the Court, and not depart without leave. Breach, that the bail being called and required, in discharge of his recognizance, to bring the principal into Court, made default. Held, that the scire facias was defective because it did not show any default of the principal. The State v. Humphries, 4 Blackf. 538
The same point was decided, at the present term, in the case of Tingley et al. v. The State.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Blackf. 29, 1838 Ind. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-state-ind-1838.