Henderson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Henderson v. State

76 S.E. 364, 11 Ga. App. 803, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 193

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 Ga. App. 672 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 27, 1912·No. 4221·Published

Opinion

Russell, J.

The accused was indicted for assault with intent to murder, and was convicted of the statutory offense of shooting at another. The evidence demanded the verdict, and the assignments of error as to various excerpts from the charge of the court are immaterial, because it is apparent, from the verdict, that none of the instructions of which complaint is made were prejudicial to the accused.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

The accused was indicted for assault with intent to murder, and was convicted of the statutory offense of shooting at another. The evidence demanded the verdict, and the assignments of error as to various excerpts from the charge of the court are immaterial, because it is apparent, from the verdict, that none of the instructions of which complaint is made were prejudicial to the accused.

Judgment affirmed.

Henderson v. State, 76 S.E. 364, 11 Ga. App. 803, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 193 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

76 S.E. 364 (Henderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.