Henderson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Henderson v. State

352 So. 2d 957

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 14, 1977

DocketNo. FF-216

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 352 So. 2d 957 (Henderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henderson v. State, 352 So. 2d 957 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Five points have been presented on this appeal from a final judgment by which appellant was adjudicated guilty of second degree murder and use of a firearm in the commission of a felony in accordance with a jury verdict finding him guilty of those crimes.

Although well briefed and argued we find each point to be without merit. While not frivolous, none of the points are novel and each has been sufficiently addressed by prior opinions of this and the other appellate courts of Florida. Accordingly, no useful purpose will be accomplished by repetition here.

Finding that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error the judgment and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Five points have been presented on this appeal from a final judgment by which appellant was adjudicated guilty of second degree murder and use of a firearm in the commission of a felony in accordance with a jury verdict finding him guilty of those crimes.

Although well briefed and argued we find each point to be without merit. While not frivolous, none of the points are novel and each has been sufficiently addressed by prior opinions of this and the other appellate courts of Florida. Accordingly, no useful purpose will be accomplished by repetition here.

Finding that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error the judgment and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

352 So. 2d 957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack