Henderson v. State

57 S.W.3d 179, 346 Ark. 385, 2001 Ark. LEXIS 582
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 345 Ark. 355
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided October 25, 2001·No. CR 01-616·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Jacinto Henderson, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. Appellant’s attorney, Q. Byrum Hurst, Jr., admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. Jones v. State, 338 Ark. 29, 992 S.W.2d 85 (1999) (per curiam) (citing Terry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 804 (1986)(per curiam)).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979)(per curiam).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. State, 57 S.W.3d 179, 346 Ark. 385, 2001 Ark. LEXIS 582 (Ark. 2001).

57 S.W.3d 179 (Henderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tarry v. State
702 S.W.2d 804 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1986)
Jones v. State
992 S.W.2d 85 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1999)