Henderson v. Singletary

734 So. 2d 1060, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14396, 1998 WL 821847
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 1998·No. No. 97-4262·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lloyd Henderson seeks review of an order of the circuit court dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus for failure to comply with a certain provision of the trial court’s standard case management order in inmate proceedings. Under the facts of this case, where there is no indication that Henderson willfully disregarded the requirements of the trial court’s order, we conclude that dismissal was too harsh a sanction. See generally Carr v. Dean Steel Buildings, Inc., 619 So.2d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Accordingly, we quash the trial court’s order dismissing Henderson’s petition, and remand for further proceedings.

BARFIELD, C.J., ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. Singletary, 734 So. 2d 1060, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14396, 1998 WL 821847 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

734 So. 2d 1060 (Henderson v. Singletary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mathis v. Florida Department of Corrections
726 So. 2d 389 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Mathis v. Florida Dept. of Corrections
726 So. 2d 389 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)