Henderson v. Ressor
This text of 248 U.S. 536 (Henderson v. Ressor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216. (2) Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Melton, 218 U. S. 36, 51-52; Eastern Building & Loan Association v. Ebaugh, 185 U. S. 114; Pennsylvania Fire Insurance Co. v. Gold Issue Mining Co., 243 U. S. 93, 96; Texas & New Orleans R. R. Co. v. Miller, 221 U. S. 408, 416.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 U.S. 536, 39 S. Ct. 21, 63 L. Ed. 408, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-ressor-scotus-1918.