Henderson v. National Bank
128 S.E. 16, 34 Ga. App. 34, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 16
This text of 128 S.E. 16 (Henderson v. National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Henderson v. National Bank, 128 S.E. 16, 34 Ga. App. 34, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 16 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).
Opinion
The sole contention of the plaintiff in error is that the verdict was not authorized by the evidence. Upon conflicting evidence the jury, as was their province, decided the issue of fact against the claimant. The verdict being supported by evidence, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
128 S.E. 16, 34 Ga. App. 34, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-national-bank-gactapp-1925.