Henderson v. Murray

966 F.2d 1442, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 21663, 1992 WL 132539

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 15, 1992
• Docket: 92-6338
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

966 F.2d 1442

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Calvin Leon HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY; David A. Garraghty; R. M. Muncy; Mr.
Aldridge; David Robberson; Sergeant Evans; R. Martin;
Branch of Mail Room Staff; L. Stokes; Doctor Thompson;
Mr. Willians; Hartson, Correctional Officer, Nottoway,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6338.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 1, 1992
Decided: June 15, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-91-216-N)

Calvin Leon Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Mary Moffett Hutcheson Priddy, Sandra Morris Holleran, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Leon Henderson appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Henderson v. Murray, No. CA-91-216-N (E.D. Va. Mar. 19, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED