Henderson v. Morgan

26 Ill. 431
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 26 Ill. 431 (Henderson v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henderson v. Morgan, 26 Ill. 431 (Ill. 1861).

Opinion

Caton, C. J.

The acknowledgment of this chattel mortgage was insufficient. The statute says, the mortgagor “may acknowledge such mortgage before any justice of the peace in the justice’s district in which he may reside,” and there is no other authority in the statute for acknowledging, and it follows as a matter of course, the mortgage cannot have the effect prescribed by the statute, unless it is acknowledged in conformity to the statute. The word “ may,” in this statute, is imperative. The meaning of the statute is, that the mortgage shall be acknowledged before a justice of the district in which the mortgagor resides. It was for the legislature to determine where the mortgage should be acknowledged, and it is not for us to inquire whether it would not have been as well to have the acknowledgment and memorandum made in the district where the property was situate. The district in this statute means election district. The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greenwald v. Lee
252 Ill. App. 184 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1929)
J. D. Best & Co. v. Wolf Co.
67 Colo. 42 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1919)
Ticknor v. McClelland
84 Ill. 471 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1877)
In re Burnett
4 F. Cas. 763 (N.D. Illinois, 1874)
Harvey v. Crane
11 F. Cas. 734 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Ill. 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-morgan-ill-1861.