Henderson v. Miller

12 N.J. Eq. 140
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery
DecidedOctober 15, 1858
StatusPublished

This text of 12 N.J. Eq. 140 (Henderson v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henderson v. Miller, 12 N.J. Eq. 140 (N.J. Ct. App. 1858).

Opinion

The Chancellor.

It has already been decided, upon demurrer in this case (2 Stock. 322), that the personal representative of Abrahams is a necessary party.

Also, that the heirs of Aaron P. Wright are necessary parties.

Also, that the heirs or devisees of Charles Wright are necessary parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freedman v. Fineberg
100 A. 179 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 N.J. Eq. 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-miller-njch-1858.