Henderson v. Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Henderson v. Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

948 N.E.2d 923, 16 N.Y.3d 886, 924 N.Y.S.2d 317

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 10, 2011

Docket146 SSM 11

StatusPublished

This text of 948 N.E.2d 923 (Henderson v. Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henderson v. Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, 948 N.E.2d 923, 16 N.Y.3d 886, 924 N.Y.S.2d 317 (N.Y. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. Appellants failed to comply with the conditional or *888 der. Therefore, the courts below did not err in striking appellants’ answer.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. Appellants failed to comply with the conditional or *888 der. Therefore, the courts below did not err in striking appellants’ answer.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

948 N.E.2d 923, 16 N.Y.3d 886, 924 N.Y.S.2d 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-manhattan-and-bronx-surface-transit-operating-authority-ny-2011.