Henderson v. Latham

195 So. 2d 94, 1967 Miss. LEXIS 1439
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided February 6, 1967·No. No. 44169·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ROBERTSON, Justice:

ON MOTION TO CLARIFY OPINION

Appellants, Mrs. Blanche S. Henderson, and Mrs. Katherine Henderson Waldrop, have asked this Court to indicate when the monthly payment of expenses incurred by them should begin, and whether the Chancellor has authority to invade the corpus, not only for necessities, but also for comforts.

This Court is of the opinion that the Chancellor has authority to reimburse Mrs. Henderson and Mrs. Waldrop for all necessary expenses incurred by them from the date of the death of Testatrix, Mary Bailey Hall, taking into account the $1,500 heretofore paid.

The Chancellor, in his sound discretion, may invade the corpus of the trust fund not only for necessities, but also for the comforts of life, for Mrs. Henderson and Mrs. Waldrop. Of course, the Chancellor should take into consideration the limited amount of the trust fund and the fact that it should last as long as reasonably possible.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. Latham, 195 So. 2d 94, 1967 Miss. LEXIS 1439 (Mich. 1967).

195 So. 2d 94 (Henderson v. Latham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First National Bank of Kansas City v. Danforth
523 S.W.2d 808 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1975)
In Re Estate of Hall
193 So. 2d 587 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1967)