Henderson v. Lackey

2 Tenn. 109
Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity·Decided September 6, 1808·Published

Opinion

Certiorari; rule to dismiss. — WILKINSON, for the petitioner, said, much inconvenience had arisen from these rules to dismisscertioraris. Upon obtaining a rule, the grounds ought to be stated. The petition disclosed a discovery of material testimony after the trial below. There can exist but two grounds for dismissing, — 1st. The not showing why the ordinary remedy by appeal was not resorted to; 2d. A want of merits apparent upon the face, of the petition. He was inclined to think that the petition ought not to be dismissed, but that it should have a trial here.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. Lackey, 2 Tenn. 109 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1808).

2 Tenn. 109 (Henderson v. Lackey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.