Henderson v. Jones
This text of Henderson v. Jones (Henderson v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7870
JACINTO ELROY HENDERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NATHANIEL JONES, Special Agent; JASON PARKER, Assistant District Attorney; HAZEL SHERRILL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00086-GCM)
Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 5, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jacinto Elroy Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jacinto Elroy Henderson appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for
failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Henderson v. Jones, No. 5:08-
cv-00086-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Henderson v. Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-jones-ca4-2009.