Henderson v. Hipp-Henderson
This text of 774 So. 2d 878 (Henderson v. Hipp-Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court’s order holding that it had personal jurisdiction over appellant is reversed. See, e.g., Baggett v. Walsh, 510 So.2d 1099, 1102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (“unless a nonresident voluntarily appears and waives all jurisdictional objections, or facts establishing minimum contacts sufficient to support an independent basis for long-arm jurisdiction over the nonresident are shown to exist, jurisdiction obtained under [The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act] does not provide in personam jurisdiction over the nonresident parent in respect to matters of support”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
774 So. 2d 878, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16953, 2000 WL 1880158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-hipp-henderson-fladistctapp-2000.