Henderson v. Hipp-Henderson

774 So. 2d 878, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16953, 2000 WL 1880158
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 29, 2000·No. No. 1D00-1387·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order holding that it had personal jurisdiction over appellant is reversed. See, e.g., Baggett v. Walsh, 510 So.2d 1099, 1102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (“unless a nonresident voluntarily appears and waives all jurisdictional objections, or facts establishing minimum contacts sufficient to support an independent basis for long-arm jurisdiction over the nonresident are shown to exist, jurisdiction obtained under [The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act] does not provide in personam jurisdiction over the nonresident parent in respect to matters of support”).

JOANOS, WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. Hipp-Henderson, 774 So. 2d 878, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16953, 2000 WL 1880158 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

774 So. 2d 878 (Henderson v. Hipp-Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bravo v. Johnson F/K/A Donlan
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024