Henderson v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Henderson v. Henderson

160 S.E. 907, 173 Ga. 559, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 353

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 15, 1931

DocketNo. 8271

StatusPublished

This text of 160 S.E. 907 (Henderson v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henderson v. Henderson, 160 S.E. 907, 173 Ga. 559, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 353 (Ga. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

This ease came to the Supreme Court by writ of error on exception complaining that the lower court erred in overruling the motion for new trial. On this question the court is evenly divided. Béck, P. J., and Gilbert and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the court did not err in overruling the motion, and Russell, C. J., and Atkinson and Hill, JJ., being of the contrary opinion, the judgment stands affirmed by operation of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This ease came to the Supreme Court by writ of error on exception complaining that the lower court erred in overruling the motion for new trial. On this question the court is evenly divided. Béck, P. J., and Gilbert and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the court did not err in overruling the motion, and Russell, C. J., and Atkinson and Hill, JJ., being of the contrary opinion, the judgment stands affirmed by operation of law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 S.E. 907, 173 Ga. 559, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-henderson-ga-1931.