Henderson v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Henderson v. Henderson

160 S.E. 907, 173 Ga. 559, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 353

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henderson v. Henderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 170 Ga. 457 →

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 15, 1931·No. No. 8271·Published

Opinion

This ease came to the Supreme Court by writ of error on exception complaining that the lower court erred in overruling the motion for new trial. On this question the court is evenly divided. Béck, P. J., and Gilbert and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the court did not err in overruling the motion, and Russell, C. J., and Atkinson and Hill, JJ., being of the contrary opinion, the judgment stands affirmed by operation of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This ease came to the Supreme Court by writ of error on exception complaining that the lower court erred in overruling the motion for new trial. On this question the court is evenly divided. Béck, P. J., and Gilbert and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the court did not err in overruling the motion, and Russell, C. J., and Atkinson and Hill, JJ., being of the contrary opinion, the judgment stands affirmed by operation of law.

Henderson v. Henderson, 160 S.E. 907, 173 Ga. 559, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 353 (Ga. 1931).

Pincite

160 S.E. 907 (Henderson v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.