Henderson v. HAMMER BUILDING AND RESTORATION, INC.
This text of 712 N.W.2d 452 (Henderson v. HAMMER BUILDING AND RESTORATION, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JOSEPH M. HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HAMMER BUILDING AND RESTORATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 1, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED. Plaintiff has failed to allege a viable claim under the "common work area" doctrine, for the reasons stated in footnote one of the Court of Appeals decision.
CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
712 N.W.2d 452, 474 Mich. 1119, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-hammer-building-and-restoration-inc-mich-2006.