Henderson v. Greenfield & Turner's Falls Street Railway Co.

52 N.E. 1080, 172 Mass. 542, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 844
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided February 28, 1899·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Morton, J.

The ruling was right. Up to the moment of the accident there was nothing in the behavior of the horse which rendered it negligent on the part of the motorman to ring the gong, and it cannot be said that to ring the gong on an electric [544]*544car in a public street half a dozen or a dozen times, which the plaintiff says was done, is of itself, without anything more, evidence of negligence. There was nothing to show that the noise and sparks were due to any defect in construction or negligence in operation. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. Greenfield & Turner's Falls Street Railway Co., 52 N.E. 1080, 172 Mass. 542, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 844 (Mass. 1899).

52 N.E. 1080 (Henderson v. Greenfield & Turner's Falls Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Partridge v. Middlesex & Boston Street Railway Co.
108 N.E. 918 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1915)
Dong Chong v. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co.
16 Haw. 272 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1904)
O'Brien v. Blue Hill Street Railway Co.
71 N.E. 951 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1904)