Henderson v. Greenfield & Turner's Falls Street Railway Co.

52 N.E. 1080, 172 Mass. 542, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 844
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedFebruary 28, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 52 N.E. 1080 (Henderson v. Greenfield & Turner's Falls Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henderson v. Greenfield & Turner's Falls Street Railway Co., 52 N.E. 1080, 172 Mass. 542, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 844 (Mass. 1899).

Opinion

Morton, J.

The ruling was right. Up to the moment of the accident there was nothing in the behavior of the horse which rendered it negligent on the part of the motorman to ring the gong, and it cannot be said that to ring the gong on an electric [544]*544car in a public street half a dozen or a dozen times, which the plaintiff says was done, is of itself, without anything more, evidence of negligence. There was nothing to show that the noise and sparks were due to any defect in construction or negligence in operation. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Partridge v. Middlesex & Boston Street Railway Co.
108 N.E. 918 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1915)
Dong Chong v. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co.
16 Haw. 272 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1904)
O'Brien v. Blue Hill Street Railway Co.
71 N.E. 951 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 N.E. 1080, 172 Mass. 542, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-greenfield-turners-falls-street-railway-co-mass-1899.