Henderson v. Glen Oak, Inc.
This text of 351 S.E.2d 640 (Henderson v. Glen Oak, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We granted certiorari in this case, Henderson v. Glen Oak, Inc., 179 Ga. App. 380 (346 SE2d 842) (1986), on questions concerning whether the respondent has recovered duplicitous damages from the petitioner and whether the jury’s award of punitive damages is supportable. We conclude that the damages are not duplicitous and that the punitive damages are supportable. Thus, we affirm.
It is true that a plaintiff cannot recover a judgment against a defendant once in contract and again in tort for the same transaction. E.g., UIV Corp. v. Oswald, 139 Ga. App. 697 (229 SE2d 512) (1976). However, we agree with the respondent that here there are séparate transactions supporting its recovery under each of the contract and tort theories. And, this was in part a tort action in which the jury was authorized to find that there were “aggravating circumstances, either in the act or the intention.” OCGA § 51-12-5; BLI Constr. Co. v. Debari, 135 Ga. App. 299, 301 (2) (217 SE2d 426) (1975). Consequently, punitive damages were awardable.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
351 S.E.2d 640, 256 Ga. 619, 1987 Ga. LEXIS 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-glen-oak-inc-ga-1987.