Henderson v. Gates

52 Ark. 371
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Mortgage.

The mortgage offered in evidence sufficiently described the subject mortgaged (Johnson v. Grisard, 51 Ark., 410) and the parties named as mortgagees. Perciful v. Platt, 36 Ark., 456; Kellogg v. Olsen, 34 Minn., 103; Morse v. Carpenter, 19 Vt., 613; Sherry v. Gilmore, 58 Wisc., 332—3; Chicago Lumber Co. v. Ashworth, 26 Kan., 212; Newton v. McKay, 29 Mich., 1; Beaman v. Whitney, 20 Me., 413; Hoffman v. Porter, 2 Brock, 156; Murray v. Blackledge, 71 N. C., 492.

The court erred in refusing to admit the mortgage in evidence.

Reverse and remand for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. Gates, 52 Ark. 371 (Ark. 1889).

52 Ark. 371 (Henderson v. Gates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neal Gin Co. v. Tradesmen's Nat. Bank
1925 OK 564 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)
First National Bank v. Cazort & McGehee Co.
186 S.W. 86 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1916)
First Nat. Bank of Bristow v. Rogers
1909 OK 166 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)
Hendren v. Wing
31 S.W. 149 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1895)