Henderson v. Dennison
1 Smith & H. 70
This text of 1 Smith & H. 70 (Henderson v. Dennison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Henderson v. Dennison, 1 Smith & H. 70 (Ind. 1848).
Opinion
— It docs not appear that Stapleford had notice of the suit by process or otherwise. It was therefore erroneous to take the bill as confessed against him. Reed v. Glover, 6 Blackf. 345; Shipley v. Mitchell, 7 Blackf. 472.
On overruling a demurrer to the bill, if requested, the court should give the defendants a reasonable time to answer. Lafavor v. Justice, 5 Blackf. 366.
Decree reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lefavour v. Justice
5 Blackf. 366 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1840)
Reed v. Glover
6 Blackf. 345 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1842)
Shipley v. Mitchell
7 Blackf. 472 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1845)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Smith & H. 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-dennison-ind-1848.