Henderson v. De Medicis

73 S.E. 27, 10 Ga. App. 190, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 705
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 19, 1911·No. 3284·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

Tlie possession of tlie personal property described in tlie possessory warrant was not acquired by tlie defendant by any of the inodes set forth in section 5371 of the Civil Code (1910), and a judgment in favor of the plaintiff was for that reason unauthorized, and, on certiorari, tlie court properly set it aside and rendered final judgment in favor of the defendant. Dennard v. Butler, 2 Ga. 4pp. 198 (58 S. E. 297); Brown v. Todd, 124 Ga. 939 (53 S. E. 687).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. De Medicis, 73 S.E. 27, 10 Ga. App. 190, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 705 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

73 S.E. 27 (Henderson v. De Medicis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilburn v. Beasley
119 S.E. 537 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)