Henderson v. Davis

1916 OK 951, 162 P. 683, 65 Okla. 12, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 599
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 14, 1916
Docket7766
StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK 951 (Henderson v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henderson v. Davis, 1916 OK 951, 162 P. 683, 65 Okla. 12, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 599 (Okla. 1916).

Opinion

Opinion by

BLEAKMORE, O.

This case comes on to be heard upon motion of defendants in'error to dismiss the appeal.

On April 20, 1915, motion for new trial was overruled, and plaintiffs in error were allowed 90 days from that date to prepare and serve a case-made. Fourteen days after the expiration of said time the trial court entered its order attempting to extend such time an additional 40 days. This last order of the court was void for want of jurisdiction, and the case-made, not being prepared and served within the time allowed by the former valid order of the court, is a nullity. McLean v. McLean, 45 Okla. 765, 147 Pac. 802.

The errors assigned are not such as may be reviewed upon transcript of the record.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McLean v. McLean
1915 OK 120 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1916 OK 951, 162 P. 683, 65 Okla. 12, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-davis-okla-1916.