Henderson v. Davis

868 F.3d 314, 2017 WL 3405177, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14723
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 9, 2017·No. No. 14-70001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:

This Court affirmed the district court’s denial of Henderson’s successive federal habeas petition in which he claimed that he is intellectually disabled and thus ineligible to be executed under Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002). Henderson v. Stephens, 791 F.3d 567 (5th Cir. 2015). The Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated our judgment, and remanded this case to us for further consideration in the light of Moore v. Texas, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 1039, 197 L.Ed.2d 416 (2017). Henderson v. Davis, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 1450, 197 L.Ed.2d 644 (2017). It appears that the remand from the Supreme Court is best vetted and addressed first by the district court.

Accordingly, we VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case to the district court for further proceedings in the light of Moore.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. Davis, 868 F.3d 314, 2017 WL 3405177, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14723 (5th Cir. 2017).

868 F.3d 314 (Henderson v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tavares J. Wright v. State of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida, 2018