Henderson v. Curtis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Henderson v. Curtis

197 S.E. 65, 57 Ga. App. 892, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 433

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 4, 1938

Docket26823

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 197 S.E. 65 (Henderson v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henderson v. Curtis, 197 S.E. 65, 57 Ga. App. 892, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 433 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Eeltoh, J.

Construing the petition against the plaintiff, this suit was one on an express contract, the alleged terms of which were too indefinite, vague, and uncertain to render it capable of being enforced. Therefore it was not error for the court to sustain the general demurrer to the petition. See, Henderson v. Curtis, 185 Ga. 390 (195 S. E. 152), transferring this case to this court.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur. Noah J. Stone, for plaintiff. G. S. Pede, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eeltoh, J.

Construing the petition against the plaintiff, this suit was one on an express contract, the alleged terms of which were too indefinite, vague, and uncertain to render it capable of being enforced. Therefore it was not error for the court to sustain the general demurrer to the petition. See, Henderson v. Curtis, 185 Ga. 390 (195 S. E. 152), transferring this case to this court.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur. Noah J. Stone, for plaintiff. G. S. Pede, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 S.E. 65, 57 Ga. App. 892, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-curtis-gactapp-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack