Henderson v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Henderson v. Commonwealth of Virginia

272 F. App'x 264

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 7, 2008·No. No. 07-7506·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terrance Henderson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Henderson v. Virginia, No. 7:06-cv-408-GEC-MFU, 2007 WL 2781722 (W.D. Va. Sept. 21, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[265]*265tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terrance Henderson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Henderson v. Virginia, No. 7:06-cv-408-GEC-MFU, 2007 WL 2781722 (W.D. Va. Sept. 21, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[265]*265tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Henderson v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 272 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

272 F. App'x 264 (Henderson v. Commonwealth of Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related