Henderson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
This text of 272 F. App'x 264 (Henderson v. Commonwealth of Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Terrance Henderson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Henderson v. Virginia, No. 7:06-cv-408-GEC-MFU, 2007 WL 2781722 (W.D. Va. Sept. 21, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[265]*265tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 F. App'x 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-commonwealth-of-virginia-ca4-2008.