Henderson v. Casteel
This text of 3 D.C. 365 (Henderson v. Casteel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court (Thruston, J. absent,) said, that whenever the issue was joined upon the right of property, the burden of proof, on that issue, is upon the plaintiff, and he,has a right to open and close the case; and that when'the plaintiff holds the affirmative of any issue, he has a right to open and close, although there may be other issues in which the affirmative is holden by the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 D.C. 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-casteel-circtddc-1828.