Henderson v. Campbell

Eighth Circuit

Henderson v. Campbell

975 F.2d 866, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 31247, 1992 WL 226936

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 17, 1992

Docket92-1972

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 975 F.2d 866 (Henderson v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henderson v. Campbell, 975 F.2d 866, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 31247, 1992 WL 226936 (8th Cir. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

975 F.2d 866

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Graylon E. HENDERSON, Appellant,
v.
Terry CAMPBELL, Parole Administrator, ADC; G. David
Guntharp, Parole Supervisor, ADC; C. Butler, Parole
Officer, ADC; Terry Cass, Parole Officer; Greg Broady,
Classification Officer, ADC, Appellees.

No. 92-1972.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: September 11, 1992.
Filed: September 17, 1992.

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Graylon E. Henderson, an Arkansas parolee, appeals from the District Court's1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action against various employees of the Arkansas Department of Correction. Henderson sought an order requiring defendants to either grant his preferred parole-release plan or explain why the plan was unsuitable. Because parole officers possess wide discretion in imposing conditions of parole, see Pierson v. Grant, 527 F.2d 161, 164 (8th Cir. 1975), we conclude that Henderson's claim does not rise to the level of a constitutional violation.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable Elsijane Trimble Roy, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

975 F.2d 866

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Graylon E. HENDERSON, Appellant,
v.
Terry CAMPBELL, Parole Administrator, ADC; G. David
Guntharp, Parole Supervisor, ADC; C. Butler, Parole
Officer, ADC; Terry Cass, Parole Officer; Greg Broady,
Classification Officer, ADC, Appellees.

No. 92-1972.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: September 11, 1992.
Filed: September 17, 1992.

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Graylon E. Henderson, an Arkansas parolee, appeals from the District Court's1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action against various employees of the Arkansas Department of Correction. Henderson sought an order requiring defendants to either grant his preferred parole-release plan or explain why the plan was unsuitable. Because parole officers possess wide discretion in imposing conditions of parole, see Pierson v. Grant, 527 F.2d 161, 164 (8th Cir. 1975), we conclude that Henderson's claim does not rise to the level of a constitutional violation.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable Elsijane Trimble Roy, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

975 F.2d 866, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 31247, 1992 WL 226936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-campbell-ca8-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack