Henderson v. Bryan
This text of 12 La. 10 (Henderson v. Bryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The .defendant, sued upon his promissory note, resisted the claim on the ground that it Avas given for the price of a slave? [11]*11sold him by the plaintiff, who died shortly after the sale, consequence of a redhibitory malady, under which she labored at the time of the sale. The case was tried by a jury, who found a verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendant is appellant from a judgment rendered thereon.
The case presents no question of law, and turns merely on that of fact. A close examination of the evidence has ,• n t ¶ • t• i ' satisfied us, that the jury did not err.
It does not, however, appear to us, that the present is a case in which the appellant should be mulcted in damages : 1 <J it may be presumed that, being a physician, he honestly imagined that a disease which baffled his skill, was incurable, and therefore a redhibitory one. J '
It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 La. 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-bryan-la-1838.