Henderson v. Brewington

16 F.3d 409, 1994 WL 31471

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 2, 1994
• Docket: 93-6721
• Status: Published

Opinion

16 F.3d 409
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

John J. HENDERSON, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Doctor BREWINGTON, in his individual capacity; Martha
Wannamaker, in her individual capacity; Donald F. Dease, in
his individual capacity; Parker Evatt, in his individual
capacity John Shupper, in his individual capacity; Edward
Porter, in his individual capacity, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-6721.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 26, 1993.
Decided Feb. 2, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge.

John J. Henderson, appellant Pro Se.

William Benson Darwin, Jr., Holcombe, Bomar, Cothran & Gunn, P.A., Spartanburg, SC, J. Christopher Mills, Fairey & Parise, P.A., Columbia, SC, for appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Henderson v. Brewington, No. CA-92-1737-7-17AJ (D.S.C. June 15, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.