Henderson v. Bernard
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION TAVARRES HENDERSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) CV 124-063 ) MR. TERRY BERNARD and ) STATE OF GEORGIA PARDONS & ) PAROLE BOARD, ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, DENIES Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, (doc. no. 2), and DISMISSES this action without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with the claims raised in this lawsuit, he must initiate a new lawsuit, which would require submission of a new complaint. See Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002). SO ORDERED this Hk day of June, 2024, at Augusta, Georgia. Sah? fo NZ A, \BiaKA ORABLE ¥ RANDAL HALL D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE PHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Henderson v. Bernard (Henderson v. Bernard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.