Henderson v. Aria Resort and Casino Holdings, LLC
This text of Henderson v. Aria Resort and Casino Holdings, LLC (Henderson v. Aria Resort and Casino Holdings, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA Rhodney Henderson, et al., Case No.: 2:21-cv-0280-JAD-NJK 4 Plaintiffs Order Adopting Report and 5]|_ v. Recommendation Aria Resort & Casino Holdings, LLC, et al., [ECF Nos. 80, 84] 7 Defendants 8 Plaintiffs brought a belated motion for leave to file a third amended complaint,' and the 9]| magistrate judge recommends that I deny it because it was brought “well after the case- management deadline for doing so” and the plaintiffs failed to establish good cause to modify the 11|| scheduling order.” The deadline for the plaintiffs to object to that recommendation passed without objection or a request to extend the deadline to file one. “[N]o review is required of a 13|| magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”? Having reviewed the report and recommendation, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. 15 IT IS ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 84] is ADOPTED and the motion for leave to amend [ECF No. 80] is DENIED. coo PG US. District JudgéJennifer-A. Dorsey 18 April 18, 2023 19 20 21 02 ECF No. 80. 2 ECF No. 84. 2313 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Henderson v. Aria Resort and Casino Holdings, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-aria-resort-and-casino-holdings-llc-nvd-2023.