Henderson v. Alexander

303 F. App'x 137
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 15, 2008·No. No. 08-1862·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David E. Henderson appeals the district court’s order granting his request to proceed in forma pauperis but dismissing this case as patently frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Henderson v. Alexander, No. 1:08-cv-01673-CCB (D. Md. June 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. Alexander, 303 F. App'x 137 (4th Cir. 2008).

303 F. App'x 137 (Henderson v. Alexander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)