Henderson v. Alexander

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 15, 2008
Docket08-1862
StatusUnpublished

This text of Henderson v. Alexander (Henderson v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henderson v. Alexander, (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1862

DAVID E. HENDERSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

LT. GEN. KEITH ALEXANDER, The National Security Agency (NSA); HENRY PAULSON, Secretary of the Treasury; STEPHEN HADLEY, The National Security Council, The White House,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01673-CCB)

Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 15, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David E. Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David E. Henderson appeals the district court’s order

granting his request to proceed in forma pauperis but dismissing

this case as patently frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

(2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal

is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the

reasons stated by the district court. Henderson v. Alexander,

No. 1:08-cv-01673-CCB (D. Md. June 30, 2008). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Henderson v. Alexander, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-v-alexander-ca4-2008.