Henderson, M. v. CCP., Phl. Co.

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 31, 2016

Docket49 EM 2016

StatusPublished

This text of Henderson, M. v. CCP., Phl. Co. (Henderson, M. v. CCP., Phl. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henderson, M. v. CCP., Phl. Co., (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A EASTERN D|STR|CT

l\/|ARK HENDERSON, : No. 49 E|\/| 2016

Petitioner

COURT OF COIV||\/|ON PLEAS PH|LADELPH|A COUNTY,

Respondent

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 31st day of |\/|ay, 2016, the App|ication for Leave to Fi|e Origina| Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are D|SM|SSED. See Commonwea/th v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (providing that hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is D|RECTED to fon/vard the filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A EASTERN D|STR|CT

l\/|ARK HENDERSON, : No. 49 E|\/| 2016

Petitioner

COURT OF COIV||\/|ON PLEAS PH|LADELPH|A COUNTY,

Respondent

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 31st day of |\/|ay, 2016, the App|ication for Leave to Fi|e Origina| Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are D|SM|SSED. See Commonwea/th v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (providing that hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is D|RECTED to fon/vard the filings to counsel of record.

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid

642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Henderson, M. v. CCP., Phl. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-m-v-ccp-phl-co-pa-2016.