Henderson, Carlton

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 19, 2007
DocketWR-68,978-01
StatusPublished

This text of Henderson, Carlton (Henderson, Carlton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henderson, Carlton, (Tex. 2007).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-68,978-01
EX PARTE CARLTON HENDERSON, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 00F0636-202-A IN THE 202ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM BOWIE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a firearm by a felon and sentenced to five years' imprisonment.

Applicant contends that he is being denied credit for time confined on a mandatory supervision violator warrant prior to revocation, and that his mandatory supervision has expired. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Price, 922 S.W.2d 957 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for making findings of fact.

The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 11.07, § 3(d), in that it shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice's Correctional Institutions Division and Parole Division, to file affidavits listing Applicant's sentence begin date, the dates Applicant was confined on any parole-revocation warrants, what credit Applicant has received for those periods of confinement, the dates any conditional release was revoked, and what date this sentence is scheduled to expire.

The trial court may also order depositions, interrogatories or a hearing. In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. C ode Crim. Proc. Art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact on the issues set out above. The trial court shall also make findings as to whether Applicant is receiving the proper amount of time credit for that time, and may also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 60 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 90 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: December 19, 2007.

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Price
922 S.W.2d 957 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Henderson, Carlton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henderson-carlton-texcrimapp-2007.