Hendershott v. Ping

24 Iowa 134
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedJanuary 31, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 24 Iowa 134 (Hendershott v. Ping) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hendershott v. Ping, 24 Iowa 134 (iowa 1867).

Opinions

Cole, J.

1. judqment men: expires in ten years, Judgments are, by our statute, made liens upon the real estate of the judgment debtor, situated in the county where they are rendered, or at- , , _ _ tested copies thereof are hied, lhe lien attaches from the date of rendition or filing. Kev. §§ 4105, 4108. It is further provided by statute (Eev. § 4109), The liens above authorized continue in force for the term of ten years only, from the date of the judgment.” It is clear, from the language of the statute, that whatever lien Worster, Templin & Co. acquired, by virtue of their judgment, was lost or ceased to be a lien after ten years from the date of its rendition. The lien, being given by statute, could continue no longer than the statute declares it shall continue.

2. _ noYmeifeat" judgment. But the lien acquired by the mortgage, was the result of the contract between the parties. The lien of the mortgage was independent of and prior to the judgment. It in no manner de[137]*137pended upon the judgment for its existence. The judgment did not merge the lien of the mortgage, but was simply a means of effectuating and enforcing that lien. The judgment did merge the mortgage debt; but a merger of the debt, or any change of the evidence of it, as by giving a note for the account secured by mortgage, by renewal of note, giving bond or other thing, short of payment, does not destroy the lien of the mortgage — that continues until the debt is paid or discharged.

3. limitation, moS|eOT: foreclosure, By our statute of limitations, suits founded on written contracts and for the recovery of real property, must be brought within ten years. Rev. § 2740, subdivision 4. This statute has been held to apply to suits for the foreclosure of mortgages, as well as to suits upon notes. Newman v. De Lorimer et al., 19 Iowa, 244. But these provisions do not apply when from the answer or testimony of the debtor, it appears affirmatively, that the cause of action still justly subsists. Rev. § 2742.

But by Revision, section 2740, subdivision 5, actions founded on a judgment of a court of record, may be brought within twenty years, and by section 3246, executions may issue at any time before the judgment is barred by the statute of limitations. An execution, therefore, may now be issued upon the judgment rendered on the mortgage debt. The mortgage debt is not averred to have been paid; nor is it barred by the statute. While the lien, acquired by virtue of \h& judgment, may have ceased at the end of ten years; yet the lien acquired by the mortgage continues until the mortgage debt is paid or discharged. Since there is no averment by plaintiff, that the mortgage debt is paid, nor any presumption of payment arising from lapse of time or the statute of limitations, it follows that the lien of the mortgage still exists.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Keir
261 N.W. 792 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1935)
Hamilton v. Henderson
230 N.W. 817 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1930)
Ritz v. Rea
135 N.W. 645 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1912)
Hansen's Empire Fur Factory v. Teabout
73 N.W. 875 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1898)
Jenks v. Shaw
68 N.W. 900 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1896)
Lakin v. C. H. McCormick & Bro.
46 N.W. 1061 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1890)
Albee v. Curtis
42 N.W. 508 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1889)
Roberts v. Lawrence
16 Ill. App. 453 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1885)
Evansville Gas-Light Co. v. State ex rel. Reitz
73 Ind. 219 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Tuttle v. Dewey
44 Iowa 306 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1876)
Hine v. K. & D. M. R.
42 Iowa 636 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1876)
Sloan v. Rice
41 Iowa 465 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1875)
Shearer v. Mills
35 Iowa 499 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1872)
Day v. Baldwin
34 Iowa 380 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1872)
Stahl v. Roost
34 Iowa 475 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 Iowa 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendershott-v-ping-iowa-1867.