Hendel v. Hendel

44 A.D.2d 532, 353 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5438
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 19, 1974
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 44 A.D.2d 532 (Hendel v. Hendel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hendel v. Hendel, 44 A.D.2d 532, 353 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5438 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 3, 1969, unanimously modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the third decretal paragraph of said judgment and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. In this conversion action for divorce, predicated on a prior existing judgment of separation, the third' decretal paragraph of the judgment preserved to the defendant wife all rights of inheritance as well as all property rights that had heretofore inured to her benefit including her right as a tenant by the entirety in the real property owned by the parties. The granting of a divorce converted the tenancy by the entirety into a tenancy in common by operation of law and similarly divested the parties of their inchoate prospective rights of inheritance. (Stelz V. Shreck, 128 N. Y. 263; Gleason v. Gleason, 26 N Y 2d 28; EPTL 5-1.2.) Neither the common law nor the applicable sections of the Domestic Relations Law (§§ 234, 236) empower the court granting a decree of divorce to change the operation of these provisions of law. (Winter v. Winter, 39 A D 2d 69, affd. 31 N Y 2d 983; Dolphus v. Dolphus, 39 A D 2d 829.) Concur — Nunez, J. P., Kupferman, Murphy, Steuer and Moore, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Radcliffe v. Radcliffe
137 Misc. 2d 859 (New York Supreme Court, 1987)
Goldberg v. Extraordinary Special Grand Juries
98 Misc. 2d 624 (New York Supreme Court, 1979)
Broadhurst v. Broadhurst
50 A.D.2d 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 A.D.2d 532, 353 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendel-v-hendel-nyappdiv-1974.