Hendee v. TOWNSHIP OF PUTNAM

768 N.W.2d 85

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 21, 2009·No. 137446·Published

Opinion

768 N.W.2d 85 (2009)

Jeffrey HENDEE, Michael Hendee, Louann Demorest Hendee, and Village Point Development, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF PUTNAM, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 137446, 137447. COA Nos. 270594, 275469.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 21, 2009.

Order

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by defendant-appellant for extension to June 25, 2009 of the time for filing their brief and appendix is considered and it is GRANTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

768 N.W.2d 85 (2009)

Jeffrey HENDEE, Michael Hendee, Louann Demorest Hendee, and Village Point Development, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF PUTNAM, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 137446, 137447. COA Nos. 270594, 275469.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 21, 2009.

Order

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by defendant-appellant for extension to June 25, 2009 of the time for filing their brief and appendix is considered and it is GRANTED.

Hendee v. TOWNSHIP OF PUTNAM, 768 N.W.2d 85 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

768 N.W.2d 85 (Hendee v. TOWNSHIP OF PUTNAM) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Jeffrey HENDEE, Michael Hendee, Louann Demorest Hendee, and Village Point Development, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. TOWNSHIP OF PUTNAM, Defendant-Appellant.

Order

Jeffrey HENDEE, Michael Hendee, Louann Demorest Hendee, and Village Point Development, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF PUTNAM, Defendant-Appellant.